<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ads, Chartjunk and the Fart Machine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.excelcharts.com/blog/ads-chartjunk-and-the-fart-machine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.excelcharts.com/blog/ads-chartjunk-and-the-fart-machine/</link>
	<description>Effective Charts and Dashboards for Excel users</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge Camoes</title>
		<link>http://www.excelcharts.com/blog/ads-chartjunk-and-the-fart-machine/#comment-1287</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Camoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excelcharts.com/blog/?p=1121#comment-1287</guid>
		<description>Mark: I understand your point, but, unlike TV ads, the reader is getting two inconsistent messages at the same time, and that&#039;s bad both for the blogger and for the advertiser. Can you imagine James Bond saying &quot;BMW Z3 is such a lousy car&quot; or something? If you find a link to a book that is inconsistent with my overall message, please let me know, and I&#039;ll remove it. And no, consistency do not mean a single, dogmatic, version of the true.

If you say &quot;x&quot;, the ads shouldn&#039;t say &quot;not x&quot;, no matter what. That&#039;s what I believe in. I know the difference between editorial content and advertising content, and if I like a blogger I will not stop reading the blog just because of the ads. But it feels strange. Let me give you an extreme (but real) example. Trent, over &lt;em&gt;The Simple Dollar&lt;/em&gt; (a blog about personal finance) removed &quot;virtually&quot; all ads in his blog. Why? Because &quot;I finally realized that the real reason I write The Simple Dollar is to help bring about positive change in people’s lives, and when the site showed ads that really conflicted with that mission, I was undercutting what I want to do here&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2007/12/18/why-ive-decided-to-abandon-google-ads-on-the-simple-dollar/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;(here&lt;/a&gt;).

By the way, I think that &quot;poor little bloggers&quot; will never turn into rich probloggers if their main source of income are Google ads, but if that&#039;s their business model, that&#039;s ok with me, poor little blogger myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark: I understand your point, but, unlike TV ads, the reader is getting two inconsistent messages at the same time, and that&#8217;s bad both for the blogger and for the advertiser. Can you imagine James Bond saying &#8220;BMW Z3 is such a lousy car&#8221; or something? If you find a link to a book that is inconsistent with my overall message, please let me know, and I&#8217;ll remove it. And no, consistency do not mean a single, dogmatic, version of the true.</p>
<p>If you say &#8220;x&#8221;, the ads shouldn&#8217;t say &#8220;not x&#8221;, no matter what. That&#8217;s what I believe in. I know the difference between editorial content and advertising content, and if I like a blogger I will not stop reading the blog just because of the ads. But it feels strange. Let me give you an extreme (but real) example. Trent, over <em>The Simple Dollar</em> (a blog about personal finance) removed &#8220;virtually&#8221; all ads in his blog. Why? Because &#8220;I finally realized that the real reason I write The Simple Dollar is to help bring about positive change in people’s lives, and when the site showed ads that really conflicted with that mission, I was undercutting what I want to do here&#8221; <a href="http://www.thesimpledollar.com/2007/12/18/why-ive-decided-to-abandon-google-ads-on-the-simple-dollar/" rel="nofollow">(here</a>).</p>
<p>By the way, I think that &#8220;poor little bloggers&#8221; will never turn into rich probloggers if their main source of income are Google ads, but if that&#8217;s their business model, that&#8217;s ok with me, poor little blogger myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.excelcharts.com/blog/ads-chartjunk-and-the-fart-machine/#comment-1286</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 06:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excelcharts.com/blog/?p=1121#comment-1286</guid>
		<description>I know this comes a bit late but I just could not help myself after reading this. The argument that displaying google ads &quot;is a dangerous game&quot; is flawfed at its very foundation. Your take that since the blogger has no control over what gets displayed, the reader can get the wrong message is akin to saying that TV producers should decide what ads to show when their soaps/serial are aired. I guess the remaining part is better left unsaid and all of us know what path will that lead to. Are you yourself not guilty of &quot;peddling&quot; a couple of books from Amazon? Spare a thought for those poor little bloggers, some of whom have Google ads as the only &quot;real&quot; source of income from their blog.

Regards,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this comes a bit late but I just could not help myself after reading this. The argument that displaying google ads &#8220;is a dangerous game&#8221; is flawfed at its very foundation. Your take that since the blogger has no control over what gets displayed, the reader can get the wrong message is akin to saying that TV producers should decide what ads to show when their soaps/serial are aired. I guess the remaining part is better left unsaid and all of us know what path will that lead to. Are you yourself not guilty of &#8220;peddling&#8221; a couple of books from Amazon? Spare a thought for those poor little bloggers, some of whom have Google ads as the only &#8220;real&#8221; source of income from their blog.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome Cukier &#187; Review of Tableau 5.0</title>
		<link>http://www.excelcharts.com/blog/ads-chartjunk-and-the-fart-machine/#comment-1285</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome Cukier &#187; Review of Tableau 5.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.excelcharts.com/blog/?p=1121#comment-1285</guid>
		<description>[...] up my Tableau review. I can see why the product has such an enthusiastic fan base. People such as Jorge Camoes, Stephen Few, Robert Kosara, Garr Reynolds, Nathan Yau, and even the Federal CIO Vivek Kundra have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up my Tableau review. I can see why the product has such an enthusiastic fan base. People such as Jorge Camoes, Stephen Few, Robert Kosara, Garr Reynolds, Nathan Yau, and even the Federal CIO Vivek Kundra have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: charts4.excelcharts.com

Served from: www.excelcharts.com @ 2012-02-07 22:41:36 -->
